Design Partners

No fake logos. Just the teams we are built for.

Arbor is pre-case-study until real customer outcomes exist. This page names the exact buyer profiles we are validating with and the pains that must prove urgent before we write a success story.

Fintech platform teams

Current pain: AI-assisted changes touch auth, payments, or reconciliation paths and reviewers cannot manually trace every downstream dependency.
Arbor wedge: Use Arbor to require owner approval and integration proof only when the security graph shows reachable sensitive paths.

B2B SaaS with compliance pressure

Current pain: SOC 2 and enterprise buyers ask how risky PRs were reviewed, but the proof lives in Slack threads and reviewer memory.
Arbor wedge: Store evidence packets tied to PRs: verdict, touched surfaces, reachable entrypoints, required proof, and limitations.

AI-heavy product teams

Current pain: Code generation has increased PR volume faster than senior reviewers can build mental context.
Arbor wedge: Add deterministic graph checks beside LLM review so unclear paths become explicit review requirements.

Customer Discovery

The questions we ask before claiming proof.

These are the prompts we use with design partners. If a team cannot describe an active, repeated pain here, they are not the early adopter.

Walk us through the last PR where a small change broke something unexpected downstream.
When a PR touches auth, payment, PII, secrets, or database code, what do reviewers manually check today?
Which branch-protection check would you actually trust enough to block a merge?
What proof would satisfy your security owner that an AI-generated PR is safe to merge?

Be a design partner.

If you review AI-generated PRs in a codebase where auth, payments, PII, or database writes matter, we will run Arbor on your repo and show the exact evidence packet.

Talk to Arbor

Back to Arbor